Effects of different fumigants on soil nutrients and microbial communities of strawberry continuous cropping
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [35]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Background] The problem of soil-borne diseases caused by successive cultivation of strawberries has become more and more prominent, and fumigants have been widely used for soil disinfection because of their remarkable effect. However, different fumigants have different effects on soil pathogenic organisms, and at the same time, they have different effects on non-target organisms and soil properties. [Objective] To explore the effects of different fumigants on soil nutrients, soil bacteria, and fungal diversity, thereby providing a scientific basis for the reasonable selection of fumigants. [Methods] Continuous cropping soil was used as material and treated with five treatments including control, soil fumigation using calcium cyanamide, soil fumigation using calcium oxide, soil fumigation using dazomet, and soil fumigation using metam-sodium, to measure soil nutrient content after fumigation. PacBio sequencing platform was used to analyze the microbial diversity of soil. [Results] Both calcium cyanamide and metam-sodium treatments increased the content of alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and decreased the content of organic matter, available phosphorus, and available potassium. Each nutrient content in the soil of dazomet treatment increased, while the content of alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium in calcium oxide treatment decreased except the content of organic matter. In addition, the pH of dazomet, calcium oxide, and metam-sodium treatments decreased significantly. A total of 1 164 bacterial OTUs and 444 fungal OTUs were obtained from five soil samples of strawberry continuous cropping. Analysis of bacterial diversity and richness showed that four fumigant treatments increased the richness of the soil bacterial community, and calcium cyanamide, calcium oxide, and metam-sodium treatments increased the diversity of soil bacterial colonies. As compared with the control, the richness of fungal colonies treated with four fumigants was lower, and the diversity of fungal colonies in calcium oxide and dazomet treatments was higher while that in calcium cyanamide and metam-sodium treatments was lower, but the difference was not significant. In the analysis of species composition, from the phylum level, the dominant bacterial phyla were Proteobacteria and Gemmatimonadetes. As compared with control, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in calcium cyanamide, calcium oxide, and dazomet treatments increased, while that in metam-sodium treatments decreased. All four treatments reduced the relative abundance of Gemmatimonadetes. The four soil fumigation treatments increased the relative abundance of Planctomycetota and Verrucomicrobia in other phyla. The analysis of dominant bacterial communities showed that soil fumigation reduced the relative abundance of bacteria such as Gemmatimonas, Luteimonas, and Mesorhizobium, but increased that of Chitinophaga and Ochrobactrum. The dominant fungus phylum was Ascomycota, and the relative abundance of Ascomycota was increased by calcium cyanamide, calcium oxide, dazomet, and metam-sodium treatments. Cladosporium and Fusarium causing soil-borne diseases in strawberry roots were detected, and the relative abundance of Cladosporium and Fusarium decreased after the fumigant treatment, among which Cladosporium decreased by 1.35%, 1.11%, 0.90%, and 1.31%, and Fusarium decreased by 0.71%, 0.85%, 0.19%, and 0.65% in calcium cyanamide, calcium oxide, dazomet, and metam-sodium treatments, respectively. All four soil fumigants increased the relative abundance of Chaetomium, a beneficial fungus. [Conclusion] Comprehensive analysis shows that fumigant treatment of continuous cropping soil changes the microbial community composition, and reduces or kills most pathogenic bacteria in the soil, thus playing an effective role in preventing and controlling soil-borne diseases of strawberries. However, it cannot kill all pathogens and affect beneficial bacteria and soil properties to different degrees. Therefore, it is very important to supplement beneficial microorganisms after treatment. According to the killing effect of pathogenic bacteria, calcium cyanamide and metam-sodium treatments are superior to other treatments and can be used as fumigants for soil application in turn. Under this experimental condition, dazomet is a weak treatment agent.

    Reference
    [1] CHEN P, WANG YZ, LIU QZ, ZHANG YT, LI XY, LI HQ, LI WH. Phase changes of continuous cropping obstacles in strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch.) production[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 155(155): 1-9.
    [2] 仝利红, 高洁, 靳永胜. 草莓不同生育期根际微生物的动态变化[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2019, 34(4): 10-15. TONG LH, GAO J, JIN YS. Dynamic changes of microorganisms in the rhizosphere of strawberry during different growth stages[J]. Journal of Beijing University OF Agriculture, 2019, 34(4): 10-15(in Chinese).
    [3] 王廷峰, 赵密珍, 关玲, 赵帆, 于红梅, 庞夫花. 江苏省不同区域草莓连作土壤养分及微生物区系分析[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(1): 86-93. WANG TF, ZHAO MZ, GUAN L, ZHAO F, YU HM, PANG FH. Analysis of nutrient contents and microbial flora in the continuous cropping soil of strawberry in different regions of Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2019, 36(1): 86-93(in Chinese).
    [4] 赵帆, 赵密珍, 王钰, 关玲, 庞夫花. 基于高通量测序研究草莓根际微生物群落结构和多样性[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(1): 51-60. ZHAO F, ZHAO MZ, WANG Y, GUAN L, PANG FH. Microbial community structures and diversities in strawberry rhizosphere soils based on high-throughput sequencing[J]. Soils, 2019, 51(1): 51-60(in Chinese).
    [5] 申光辉. 草莓连作根腐病发生机制与微生物及化学修复研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学博士学位论文, 2012. SHEN GH. Study on the occurrence mechanism, microbial and chemical remediation of strawberry root rot in continuous cropping[D]. Yangling: Doctoral Dissertation of Northwest A&F University, 2012(in Chinese).
    [6] 戚嘉琦. 高温闷棚配施生物制剂对草莓连作障碍修复作用的研究[D]. 淮阴: 淮阴工学院硕士学位论文, 2021. QI JQ. Study on the effect of applying biological agents in high-temperature greenhouse to repair strawberry continuous cropping obstacle[D]. Huaiyin: Master’s Thesis of Huaiyin Institute of Technology, 2021(in Chinese).
    [7] 王素素, 杜国栋, 吕德国. 土壤高温处理对连作草莓根系呼吸代谢及植株发育的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2011, 28(2): 234-239. WANG SS, DU GD, LÜ DG. Effects of soil high temperature treatment on root respiratory metabolism and plant development of continuous cropping strawberry[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2011, 28(2): 234-239(in Chinese).
    [8] 王礼. 石灰氮对土壤微生物种群及黄瓜枯萎病病原菌影响的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学硕士学位论文, 2006. WANG L. Effects of lime nitrogen on soil microbial population and pathogen of cucumber Fusarium wilt[D]. Hangzhou: Master’s Thesis of Zhejiang University, 2006(in Chinese).
    [9] 张大琪. 氯化苦与生物熏蒸轮用对草莓土传病害防控效果和对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院硕士学位论文, 2020. ZHANG DQ. Control effect of chloropicrin and biological fumigation rotation on soil-borne diseases of strawberry and its influence on soil microbial community structure[D]. Beijing: Master’s Thesis of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2020(in Chinese).
    [10] 钟书堂, 吕娜娜, 孙逸飞, 沈宗专, 李荣, 张娟, 沈其荣. 连作香蕉园生态熏蒸剂的筛选及其对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(6): 1092-1100. ZHONG ST, LÜ NN, SUN YF, SHEN ZZ, LI R, ZHANG J, SHEN QR. Screening of ecological fumigants in continuous cropping banana plantations and their effects on soil microbial community structure[J]. Soils, 2015, 47(6): 1092-1100(in Chinese).
    [11] 贾喜霞, 师桂英, 黄炜, 张立彭, 吕海龙, 高启发. 土壤消毒剂配施微生物有机肥及生防菌剂缓解设施茄子连作障碍的作用效应微生物菌剂[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(13): 4492-4498. JIA XX, SHI GY, HUANG W, ZHANG LP, LÜ HL, GAO QF. Effect of soil disinfectant combined with microbial organic fertilizer and biocontrol agent on alleviating continuous cropping obstacle of greenhouse eggplant microbial agent[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(13): 4492-4498(in Chinese).
    [12] 张艳. 设施草莓生产石灰氮土壤处理技术初探[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2014, 30(11): 190-190, 215. ZHANG Y. Preliminary study on lime nitrogen soil treatment technology for strawberry production in facilities[J]. Zhongguo Yuanyi Wenzhai, 2014, 30(11): 190-190, 215(in Chinese).
    [13] 张庆华, 曾祥国, 韩永超, 向发云, 过聪, 陈丰滢, 顾玉成. 土壤熏蒸剂棉隆和生物菌肥对草莓连作土壤真菌多样性的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2018, 45(5): 1048-1060. ZHANG QH, ZENG XG, HAN YC, XIANG FY, GUO C, CHEN FY, GU YC. Effects of dazomet fumigation and biological fertilizer on strawberry soil fungal diversity under replant conditions[J]. Microbiology China, 2018, 45(5): 1048-1060(in Chinese).
    [14] 李青杰, 方文生, 颜冬冬, 王秋霞, 曹坳程. 熏蒸剂对土壤微生物的影响研究进展[J]. 农药学学报, 2019, 21(5): 780-786. LI QJ, FANG WS, YAN DD, WANG QX, CAO AC. Research progress on the effect of fumigants on soil microorganisms[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2019, 21(5): 780-786(in Chinese).
    [15] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. BAO SD. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000(in Chinese).
    [16] 孙建平, 刘雅辉, 左永梅, 韩民利, 张虹伟, 吕晶晶. 盐地碱蓬根际土壤细菌群落结构及其功能[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(10): 1618-1629. SUN JP, LIU YH, ZUO YM, HAN ML, ZHANG HW, LYU JJ. The bacterial community structure and function of Suaeda salsa rhizosphere soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(10): 1618-1629(in Chinese).
    [17] STRAUSS SL, KLUEPFEL DA. Anaerobic soil disinfestation: A chemical-independent approach to pre-plant control of plant pathogens[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(11): 2309-2318.
    [18] 赵存鹏, 郭宝生, 刘素恩, 王兆晓, 耿昭, 王凯辉, 耿军义. 粮棉轮作对土壤中养分及真菌多样性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(6): 139-146. ZHAO CP, GUO BS, LIU SE, WANG ZX, GENG Z, WANG KH, GENG JY. Effect of cotton and grain crops rotation on nutrients contents and diversity of fungi in the soil[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2017, 32(6): 139-146(in Chinese).
    [19] 胡洪涛, 朱志刚, 焦忠久, 闵勇, 曹春霞, 颜冬冬, 曹坳程. 棉隆土壤消毒对高山甘蓝根肿病的防效及土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2019, 38(3): 25-31. HU HT, ZHU ZG, JIAO ZJ, MIN Y, CAO CX, YAN DD, CAO AC. Effects of soil disinfection by dazomet on control efficacy of cabbage clubroot disease and soil fungal communities in high mountain area[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2019, 38(3): 25-31(in Chinese).
    [20] 徐少卓, 刘宇松, 夏明星, 王英平, 陈学森, 沈向, 尹承苗, 毛志泉. 棉隆熏蒸加短期轮作葱显著减轻苹果连作障碍[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(1): 11-20. XU SZ, LIU YS, XIA MX, WANG YP, CHEN XS, SHEN X, YIN CM, MAO ZQ. Dazomet fumigation and short-time Allium fistulosum rotation can significantly reduce the apple replant disease[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2018, 45(1): 11-20(in Chinese).
    [21] YAKABE LE, PARKER SR, KLUEPFEL DA. Effect of pre-plant soil fumigants on agrobacterium tumefaciens, pythiaceous species, and subsequent soil recolonization by A. tumefaciens [J]. Crop Protection, 2010, 29(6): 583-590.
    [22] de CAL A, MARTINEZ-TRECEÑO A, SALTO T, LÓPEZ-ARANDA JM, MELGAREJO P. Effect of chemical fumigation on soil fungal communities in Spanish strawberry nurseries[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2005, 28(1): 47-56.
    [23] 张立彭, 师桂英, 史贵红, 于彦琳, 李谋强, 苏国礼, 贾喜霞. 土壤熏蒸-微生物菌剂联用缓解兰州百合(Lilium davidii var. unicolor)连作障碍研究[J]. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(5): 169-179. ZHANG LP, SHI GY, SHI GH, YU YL, LI MQ, SU GL, JIA XX. Alleviating obstacles of continuous cropping in Lanzhou lily by soil fumigation combined with microbial fertilizer[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(5): 169-179(in Chinese).
    [24] 贲海燕, 石延霞, 谢学文, 柴阿丽, 李宝聚. 氰氨化钙土壤消毒对黄瓜根腐病及土壤病原菌的控制效果[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(11): 2173-2181. BEN HY, SHI YX, XIE XW, CHAI AL, LI BJ. Studies of soil improvement effect of calcium cyanamide and its control efficiency on soil-borne diseases of vegetable crops[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2016, 43(11): 2173-2181(in Chinese).
    [25] COLLINS HP, ALVA A, BOYDSTON RA, COCHRAN RL, HAMM PB, McGUIRE A, RIGA E. Soil microbial, fungal, and nematode responses to soil fumigation and cover crops under potato production[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2006, 42(3): 247-257.
    [26] 李青杰, 张大琪, 任立瑞, 颜冬冬, 李园, 王秋霞, 曹坳程. 氯化苦和棉隆对草莓土壤养分、病原菌及微生物群落的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2021, 44(6): 24-29. LI QJ, ZHANG DQ, REN LR, YAN DD, LI Y, WANG QX, CAO AC. Effects of chloropicrin and dazomet on strawberry soil nutrients, pathogenic bacteria and microbial communities[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2021, 44(6): 24-29(in Chinese).
    [27] 岳丹丹, 韩贝, ULLAH A, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 干旱条件下棉花根际真菌多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1806-1815. YUE DD, HAN B, ULLAH A, ZHANG XL, YANG XY. Fungi diversity analysis of rhizosphere under drought conditions in cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1806-1815(in Chinese).
    [28] MESZKA B, MALUSÀ E. Effects of soil disinfection on health status, growth and yield of strawberry stock plants[J]. Crop Protection, 2014, 63: 113-119.
    [29] 赵帆, 赵密珍, 王钰, 庞夫花. 不同连作年限草莓根际细菌和真菌多样性变化[J]. 微生物学通报, 2017, 44(6): 1377-1386. ZHAO F, ZHAO MZ, WANG Y, PANG FH. Biodiversity of bacteria and fungi in rhizosphere of strawberry with different continuous cropping years[J]. Microbiology China, 2017, 44(6): 1377-1386(in Chinese).
    [30] 吕靖雯, 刘蕊, 李国华, 李红叶, 王洪凯. 柚果面枝孢菌斑点病病原鉴定[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(6): 687-694. LÜ JW, LIU R, LI GH, LI HY, WANG HK. Identification of pathogens causing fruit spot disease on Citrus grandis[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture & Life Sciences), 2018, 44(6): 687-694(in Chinese).
    [31] SHE SY, NIU JJ, ZHANG C, XIAO YH, CHEN W, DAI LJ, LIU XD, YIN HQ. Significant relationship between soil bacterial community structure and incidence of bacterial wilt disease under continuous cropping system[J]. Archives of Microbiology, 2017, 199(2): 267-275.
    [32] 李晶晶, 续勇波. 连作年限对设施百合土壤微生物多样性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(2): 343-351. LI JJ, XU YB. Effects of continuous cropping years of lily on soil microbial diversities under greenhouse cultivation[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2020, 51(2): 343-351(in Chinese).
    [33] 史文宇. 绿肥-秸秆协同还田对连作棉田土壤微生物群落和功能多样性的影响[D]. 邯郸: 河北工程大学硕士学位论文, 2021. SHI WY. Effect of green manure-straw cooperative returning on soil microbial community and functional diversity in continuous cropping cotton field[D]. Handan: Master’s Thesis of Hebei University of Engineering, 2021(in Chinese).
    [34] 陈梦, 陈敬忠, 刘济明, 武梦瑶, 颜强, 李鹏, 黄路婷, 肖雪峰. 小蓬竹根际土壤微生物及内生真菌多样性分析[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10): 4120-4130. CHEN M, CHEN JZ, LIU JM, WU MY, YAN Q, LI P, HUANG LT, XIAO XF. Diversity analysis of rhizosphere soil fungi and endophytic fungi in Ampelocalamus luodianensis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 4120-4130(in Chinese).
    [35] 陈利达, 石延霞, 李磊, 柴阿丽, 郭宁, 范腾飞, 谢学文, 李宝聚. 不同土壤熏蒸剂对生菜种植土壤镰孢病菌的抑制效果及土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2021, 29(12): 2365-2374. CHEN LD, SHI YX, LI L, CHAI AL, GUO N, FAN TF, XIE XW, LI BJ. Efficacies of different soil fumigants against Fusarium spp. of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) planting soil and their influences on soil microbial community[J]. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2021, 29(12): 2365-2374(in Chinese).
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

YANG Fuxia, TANG Ling, HE Huan, TANG Xiaogang, WANG Weicheng. Effects of different fumigants on soil nutrients and microbial communities of strawberry continuous cropping[J]. Microbiology China, 2023, 50(6): 2452-2467

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:387
  • PDF: 1018
  • HTML: 1164
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:August 15,2022
  • Adopted:October 31,2022
  • Online: June 05,2023
  • Published: June 25,2023
Article QR Code