Diversity of endophytic bacteria in different tissues of triploid Populus tomentosa
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [25]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    [Background] Triploid Populus tomentosa is suitable for the ecological and economic development of the Yellow River and serves as an important tree species for forestry extension projects in China. Endophytic bacteria of triploid P. tomentosa play a role in the disease prevention, growth promotion, nitrogen fixation, and biological repair. [Objective] The objective was to analyze the diversity of endophytic bacteria and fully explore the microbial resources in triploid P. tomentosa. [Methods] In this study, the diversity of endophytic bacterial community in the roots, stems and leaves of P. tomentosa from the research base of Beijing Forestry University in Guanxian county, Shandong province was analyzed via 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing and plate streaking. The variation trends and rules of endophytic bacterial diversity in different tissues of triploid P. tomentosa were clarified to lay a theoretical foundation for the further application of endophytic bacteria. [Results] The endophytic bacteria of triploid P. tomentosa had the highest richness and diversity in the roots while the lowest in the leaves. Pseudomonas and Actinobacteria were the dominant phyla, and Burkholderia, Pseudonocardia, and Acidovorax were the dominant genera. The structure of endophytic bacterial community varied among different tissues. The functions of the endophytic bacteria mainly involved amino acid metabolism, vitamin metabolism, degradation of aromatic compounds, and glycolysis. A total of 217 endophytic bacterial strains were isolated, belonging to 44 species of 23 genera. Among them, four strains shared the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity below 97.5%, which might be new taxa. [Conclusion] In conclusion, the diversity of endophytic bacteria in the roots, stems and leaves of triploid P. tomentosa was significant. The diversity and richness of endophytic bacteria were higher in the roots than in the stems than in the leaves. Some endophytic bacterial resources were obtained by traditional isolation and culture methods, including 4 strains with 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity less than 97.5%. However, the results of high-throughput sequencing showed that a large number of endophytic bacterial strains had not been cultured in this experiment. It was necessary to further develop new high-throughput isolation, culture and identification methods to fully explore more uncultured and difficult endophytic bacterial strains.

    Reference
    [1] Yan K, He LM, Zhou WH, Feng RZ, Meng LN, Wei Q, Liu Y. Determination of the community structure and diversity of endophytic bacteria from Alpinia zerumbet seeds[J]. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2020, 24(3): 420-428
    [2] Emami S, Alikhani HA, Pourbabaei AA, Etesami H, Sarmadian F, Motessharezadeh B. Effect of rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria with multiple plant growth promoting traits on wheat growth[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2019, 26(19): 19804-19813
    [3] Hazarika DJ, Goswami G, Gautom T, Parveen A, Das P, Barooah M, Boro RC. Lipopeptide mediated biocontrol activity of endophytic Bacillus subtilis against fungal phytopathogens[J]. BMC Microbiology, 2019, 19(1): 71
    [4] Zhu YL. Isolation and identification of Ammodendron bifolium endophytic bacteria and the action mechanism of selected isolates-induced seed germination and their effects on host osmotic-stress tolerance[J]. Archives of Microbiology, 2019, 201(4): 431-442
    [5] Pandey PK, Samanta R, Yadav RNS. Inside the plant: addressing bacterial endophytes in biotic stress alleviation[J]. Archives of Microbiology, 2019, 201(4): 415-429
    [6] Beckers B, Op de Beeck M, Weyens N, Boerjan W, Vangronsveld J. Structural variability and niche differentiation in the rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial microbiome of field-grown poplar trees[J]. Microbiome, 2017, 5(1): 25
    [7] Schmidt CS, Lovecká P, Mrnka L, Vychodilová A, Strejček M, Fenclová M, Demnerová K. Distinct communities of poplar endophytes on an unpolluted and a risk element-polluted site and their plant growth- promoting potential in vitro[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2018, 75(4): 955-969
    [8] Firrincieli A, Khorasani M, Frank AC, Doty SL. Influences of climate on phyllosphere endophytic bacterial communities of wild poplar[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11: 203
    [9] Wang YB, Zhang WX, Ding CJ, Zhang BY, Huang QJ, Huang RF, Su XH. Endophytic communities of transgenic poplar were determined by the environment and niche rather than by transgenic events[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019, 10: 588
    [10] 孙岩. 杨属植物根内生菌及根际细菌多样性研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院硕士学位论文, 2015Sun Y. Study on the endophytic diversity in Populus roots and bacteria diversity in rhizosphere[D]. Beijing: Master's Thesis of Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2015(in Chinese)
    [11] 胥丽娜, 徐亮, 李磊, 邹玉峰, 赵春青, 张卫光, 刘振宇. 枯草芽孢杆菌对杨树水泡溃疡病菌菌丝生长的抑制作用[J]. 菌物研究, 2007, 5(3): 165-168Xu LN, Xu L, Li L, Zou YF, Zhao CQ, Zhang WG, Liu ZY. Inhibition effect of Bacillus subtilis on the growth of Botryosphaeria dothidea[J]. Journal of Fungal Research, 2007, 5(3): 165-168(in Chinese)
    [12] 陈越渠, 李立梅, 毛赫, 张立民, 王牧原, 李殿锋, 张晓军. 杨树烂皮病内生拮抗菌的筛选及鉴定[J]. 植物保护, 2015, 41(6): 126-131Chen YQ, Li LM, Mao H, Zhang LM, Wang MY, Li DF, Zhang XJ. Screening of antagonistic bacteria of Valsa sordida and identification of the strain NS3[J]. Plant Protection, 2015, 41(6): 126-131(in Chinese)
    [13] Moore FP, Barac T, Borremans B, Oeyen L, Vangronsveld J, Van Der Lelie D, Campbell CD, Moore ERB. Endophytic bacterial diversity in poplar trees growing on a BTEX-contaminated site: the characterisation of isolates with potential to enhance phytoremediation[J]. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 2006, 29(7): 539-556
    [14] van der Lelie D, Taghavi S, Monchy S, Schwender J, Miller L, Ferrieri R, Rogers A, Wu X, Zhu W, Weyens N, et al. Poplar and its bacterial endophytes: coexistence and harmony[J]. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2009, 28(5): 346-358
    [15] Kang JW, Khan Z, Doty SL. Biodegradation of trichloroethylene by an endophyte of hybrid poplar[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(9): 3504-3507
    [16] Ryan RP, Germaine K, Franks A, Ryan DJ, Dowling DN. Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications[J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2008, 278(1): 1-9
    [17] 杨文琦, 龙宣杞, 崔卫东. 玉米青贮中细菌多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(8): 1424-1433Yang WQ, Long XQ, Cui WD. Bacteria diversity analysis in corn silage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(8): 1424-1433(in Chinese)
    [18] 邹媛媛, 刘洋, 赵亮, 刘琳, 宋未. 两种抗病性不同的水稻种子固有细菌群落的多样性研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2016, 18(4): 9-16Zou YY, Liu Y, Zhao L, Liu L, Song W. Research on the diversity of indigenous bacterial community in the seeds of two rice varieties with different disease-resistance[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, 18(4): 9-16(in Chinese)
    [19] 符鲜, 杨树青, 刘德平, 张华, 刘敏, 杨水源, 孙云岭. 套作小麦/玉米不同施氮水平对土壤养分与微生物数量的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2017, 34(1): 43-50Fu X, Yang SQ, Liu DP, Zhang H, Liu M, Yang SY, Sun YL. Effects of different nitrogen application levels on soil nutrient content and soil edaphon population in wheat/corn intercropping field[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2017, 34(1): 43-50(in Chinese)
    [20] 朱之悌. 三倍体毛白杨新品种简介[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2002, 24(S1): 60-62Zhu ZT. A brief introduction of new triploid Populus tomentosa species[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2002, 24(S1): 60-62(in Chinese)
    [21] 张爱梅, 殷一然, 孙坤. 沙棘属植物弗兰克氏菌研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(11): 3933-3944Zhang AM, Yin YR, Sun K. Research progress in Frankia spp. associated with Hippophae L.[J]. Microbiology China, 2020, 47(11): 3933-3944(in Chinese)
    [22] Ren GM, Xu XH, Qu JJ, Zhu LP, Wang TT. Evaluation of microbial population dynamics in the co-composting of cow manure and rice straw using high throughput sequencing analysis[J]. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2016, 32(6): 101
    [23] Oren A, Garrity GM. Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2021, 71(10): 005056
    [24] 任丽娟, 何聃, 邢鹏, 王毓菁, 吴庆龙. 湖泊水体细菌多样性及其生态功能研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2013, 21(4): 422-433Ren LJ, He D, Xing P, Wang YJ, Wu QL. Bacterial diversity and ecological function in lake water bodies[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2013, 21(4): 422-433(in Chinese)
    [25] 蒲强, 谭志远, 彭桂香, 李永涛, 刘丽辉, 张海春, 曹禺. 根瘤菌分类的新进展[J]. 微生物学通报, 2016, 43(3): 619-633Pu Q, Tan ZY, Peng GX, Li YT, Liu LH, Zhang HC, Cao Y. Advances in rhizobia taxonomy[J]. Microbiology China, 2016, 43(3): 619-633(in Chinese)
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

YANG Jingjing, HAN Shuo, WANG Xia, ZHAO Guozhu, HE Xiangwei. Diversity of endophytic bacteria in different tissues of triploid Populus tomentosa[J]. Microbiology China, 2022, 49(8): 3021-3036

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:315
  • PDF: 811
  • HTML: 926
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:December 13,2021
  • Adopted:January 19,2022
  • Online: July 28,2022
  • Published: August 20,2022
Article QR Code