科微学术

微生物学通报

PCR反应条件对16S rRNA基因扩增子测序准确性的影响
作者:
基金项目:

中国科技部科技基础资源调查专项(2021FY100901)


Effect of PCR conditions on the accuracy of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [18]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【背景】16S rRNA基因扩增子测序技术是一种不依赖培养而获得样本中细菌种群结构、相对丰度等信息的方法。高通量测序技术实验步骤较多,每一步骤细微的差别都可能在最终的测序结果中放大,并造成测序结果与实际情况的偏差。【目的】基于MiSeq测序平台,探讨PCR反应体系中扩增引物序列、退火温度、模板起始量、扩增循环数和变性时间等5个因素对16S rRNA基因测序结果的影响。【方法】对mock DNA的16S rRNA基因扩增子进行测序,分别分析不同的扩增引物、退火温度、模板起始量、循环数和变性时间对数据准确性的影响。【结果】不同的扩增引物对检测结果有较大的影响,采用的4组引物中,引物B (V3–V4,341F/806R)的准确性最好,引物A (V3–V4,341F/805R)次之。比较不同退火温度(52、55和60℃)对检测准确性的影响,退火温度60℃的结果最接近理论值。模板起始量(2、10和50 ng)的检测结果显示,mock DNA起始量为2 ng的结果准确性最高。相较于其他3组(15+18、25+8和30+8),循环数为(20+8)的检测结果最接近mock DNA的理论值。不同变性时间(3 min和5 min)对分析结果无显著性影响。【结论】引物序列、退火温度、模板起始量和循环数是影响16S rRNA基因测序结果准确性的重要因素。

    Abstract:

    [Background] 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, a culture-independent approach, is commonly used to identify the bacterial community structure and relative abundance in given samples. The protocol of high-throughput sequencing technology involves many experimental steps, and the nuances of each step may be magnified in the final sequencing results, resulting in unexpected deviations from the actual situation. [Objective] With MiSeq system, we evaluated the impact of five factors in PCR on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing results: primer sequence, annealing temperature, template quantity, cycle number, and denaturation time. [Methods] The 16S rRNA gene amplicon of mock community DNA was sequenced to determine the effects of these five factors on the accuracy of the results achieved. [Results] Primer had great influence on the 16S rRNA sequencing results, and primer B (V3–V4, 341F/806R) showed the highest quantification accuracy among all primers, followed by primer A (V3–V4, 341F/805R). Among the different annealing temperatures (52, 55 and 60 ℃), the result of annealing at 60 ℃ was closest to the theoretical value. As for the DNA template quantity (2, 10 and 50 ng), the deviation was minimal when 2 ng DNA template was used. The result of detection with (20+8) cycles was closest to the theoretical value of mock DNA compared with that of the other three groups (15+18, 25+8, and 30+8). Denaturation time (3 min and 5 min) had no significant effect on the experimental results. [Conclusion] This study revealed that primer sequence, annealing temperature, template quantity, and number of cycles were important factors affecting the accuracy of 16S rRNA gene sequencing results, which laid a foundation for the selection of standardized methods of library construction.

    参考文献
    [1] Walker AW, Martin JC, Scott P, Parkhill J, Flint HJ, Scott KP. 16S rRNA gene-based profiling of the human infant gut microbiota is strongly influenced by sample processing and PCR primer choice[J]. Microbiome, 2015, 3(1): 26
    [2] 陆晓菊, 官会林, 张正芸, 马永存, 唐蜀昆. 三七连作根际土壤微生物区系的16S rRNA系统遗传多样性[J]. 微生物学报, 2015, 55(2): 205-213 Lu XJ, Guan HL, Zhang ZY, Ma YC, Tang SK. Microbial distribution and 16S rRNA diversity in the rhizosphere soil of Panax notoginseng[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2015, 55(2): 205-213(in Chinese)
    [3] 杨娟, 郝志成, 张亚平. 基于MiSeq测序分析新疆泥火山土壤细菌群落多样性[J]. 微生物学通报, 2016, 43(12): 2609-2618 Yang J, Hao ZC, Zhang YP. Analysis the diversity of soil bacterial community from mud volcano in Xinjiang using MiSeq sequencing[J]. Microbiology China, 2016, 43(12): 2609-2618(in Chinese)
    [4] 王小敏, 徐鹏, 饶传, 王微微, 杨秋丽, 熊久先. 基于16S rRNA基因测序技术分析猪链球菌2型感染BALB/c小鼠粪便样本中微生物的变化[J]. 微生物学报, 2020, 60(5): 963-971 Wang XM, Xu P, Rao C, Wang WW, Yang QL, Xiong JX. Effects of Streptococcus suis type 2 on the fecal microflora of BALB/c mice based on 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2020, 60(5): 963-971(in Chinese)
    [5] Schirmer M, Ijaz UZ, D’Amore R, Hall N, Sloan WT, Quince C. Insight into biases and sequencing errors for amplicon sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq platform[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2015, 43(6): e37
    [6] Finotello F, Mastrorilli E, Di Camillo B. Measuring the diversity of the human microbiota with targeted next-generation sequencing[J]. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2018, 19(4): 679-692
    [7] Kennedy NA, Walker AW, Berry SH, Duncan SH, Farquarson FM, Louis P, Thomson JM, Consortium UKIG, Satsangi J, Flint HJ, et al. The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(2): e88982
    [8] Nechvatal JM, Ram JL, Basson MD, Namprachan P, Niec SR, Badsha KZ, Matherly LH, Majumdar APN, Kato I. Fecal collection, ambient preservation, and DNA extraction for PCR amplification of bacterial and human markers from human feces[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2008, 72(2): 124-132
    [9] Salipante SJ, Kawashima T, Rosenthal C, Hoogestraat DR, Cummings LA, Sengupta DJ, Harkins TT, Cookson BT, Hoffman NG. Performance comparison of Illumina and ion torrent next-generation sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA-based bacterial community profiling[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2014, 80(24): 7583-7591
    [10] D’Amore R, Ijaz UZ, Schirmer M, Kenny JG, Gregory R, Darby AC, Shakya M, Podar M, Quince C, Hall N. A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling[J]. BMC Genomics, 2016, 17: 55
    [11] 冯广达, 陈美标, 羊宋贞, 朱红惠. 用于PCR扩增的细菌DNA提取方法比较[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2013, 34(3): 439-442 Feng GD, Chen MB, Yang SZ, Zhu HH. A comparative study on bacteria DNA extraction methods used for PCR amplification[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2013, 34(3): 439-442(in Chinese)
    [12] 吴悦妮, 冯凯, 厉舒祯, 王朱珺, 张照婧, 邓晔. 16S/18S/ITS扩增子高通量测序引物的生物信息学评估和改进[J]. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47(9): 2897-2912 Wu YN, Feng K, Li SZ, Wang ZJ, Zhang ZJ, Deng Y. In-silico evaluation and improvement on 16S/18S/ITS primers for amplicon high-throughput sequencing[J]. Microbiology China, 2020, 47(9): 2897-2912(in Chinese)
    [13] Zhou HW, Li DF, Tam NFY, Jiang XT, Zhang H, Sheng HF, Qin J, Liu X, Zou F. BIPES, a cost-effective high-throughput method for assessing microbial diversity[J]. The ISME Journal, 2011, 5(4): 741-749
    [14] Gohl DM, Vangay P, Garbe J, MacLean A, Hauge A, Becker A, Gould TJ, Clayton JB, Johnson TJ, Hunter R, et al. Systematic improvement of amplicon marker gene methods for increased accuracy in microbiome studies[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2016, 34(9): 942-949
    [15] He Y, Zhou BJ, Deng GH, Jiang XT, Zhang H, Zhou HW. Comparison of microbial diversity determined with the same variable tag sequence extracted from two different PCR amplicons[J]. BMC Microbiology, 2013, 13(1): 208
    [16] Ederson CJ, Susilawati E, Smith SL, Wang Q, Chai BL, Farris R, Rodrigues JLM, Thelen KD, Tiedje JM. Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of biofuel crops grown on marginal lands as evaluated by 16S rRNA gene pyrosequences[J]. BioEnergy Research, 2010, 3(1): 20-27
    [17] Peiffer JA, Spor A, Koren O, Jin Z, Tringe SG, Dangl JL, Buckler ES, Ley RE. Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(16): 6548-6553
    [18] Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, 41(1): e1
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

赵枫,史亚,王莹,梁倩,陈欢,李樱红,窦晓兵,何陆平. PCR反应条件对16S rRNA基因扩增子测序准确性的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2022, 49(7): 2527-2537

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:488
  • 下载次数: 1333
  • HTML阅读次数: 1831
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-15
  • 录用日期:2021-12-30
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-07-06
  • 出版日期: 2022-07-20
文章二维码