科微学术

微生物学通报

三种不同土壤改良剂对黄瓜根际微生物数量和群落代谢功能多样性的影响
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(31760569)


Effects of three different soil amendments on the number and metabolic function diversity of rhizospheric microorganisms of cucumber
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [35]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【背景】土壤微生物在调节植物生长、提高土壤养分利用率及维持生态系统稳定性等方面发挥着重要作用。【目的】探讨蚯蚓原位处理废弃物及脱硫石膏改良土壤后的微生物群落结构多样性特征,深入研究黄瓜根际微生物群落数量与微生物指数之间的相关性。【方法】通过平板培养法测定可培养真菌、细菌、放线菌群落数量与Biolog-ECO微平板法分析OD590值微生物碳源利用率相结合,研究蚯蚓处理废弃物原位生成蚯蚓粪替代土壤(T1)、脱硫石膏(3 t/hm2)(T2)、蚯蚓处理废弃物原位生成蚯蚓粪与脱硫石膏混施(T3)这3种土壤处理下栽培黄瓜,其根际微生物群落多样性特征。【结果】T1、T3处理的可培养放线菌数量显著高于CK、T2;细菌与真菌菌落数量无显著性差异。各处理的平均每孔颜色变化率(average well color development,AWCD)呈“厂”型趋势变化,在0−96 h上升迅速,96−144 h缓慢上升至最高值,T1、T3处理的AWCD值高于CK、T2。与对照相比,各处理的AWCD值、Shannon指数、Simpson指数、Pielou指数和McIntosh指数存在显著性差异。与CK相比,T1与T2处理的碳源利用率较高。细菌、放线菌数量与AWCD值、Shannon指数、Simpson指数、McIntosh指数和Pielou指数呈显著性正相关(p<0.05或p<0.01),而真菌可培养数量与AWCD值、Shannon指数、Simpson指数、McIntosh指数和Pielou指数呈显著性负相关(p<0.05或p<0.01)。【结论】蚯蚓原位处理废弃物种养模式下,土壤可培养微生物总菌群落较多,群落多样性指数较高,微生物碳源利用率较高,探究蚯蚓处理废弃物的生态功能特征变化,以期为新型栽培模式提供理论依据。

    Abstract:

    [Background] Soil microbes play an important role in regulating plant growth, improving soil nutrient utilization rate and maintaining ecosystem stability. [Objective] To explore the structure diversity of the microbial community in cucumber rhizospheric soil under the in situ treatment of waste by earthworms and the treatment with desulfurization gypsum for soil improvement, and reveal the relationship between the number of soil microorganisms and microbial diversity indexes. [Methods] We determined the number of cultivable fungi, bacteria, and actinomycetes in the cucumber rhizospheric soils treated with three different amendments (T1–T3), and employed Biolog-ECO microplate method to study the metabolic functions of microbial communities. We then compared the number and metabolic function diversity between the in-situ treatment of waste by earthworms (T1), the treatment with desulfurization gypsum (T2), and the combination of the above two treatments (T3). [Results] The number of cultivable actinomycetes of T1 and T3 treatments was significantly higher than that of CK and T2, and that of bacterial and fungal colonies had no significant difference among treatments. The AWCD values of different treatments presented an upward trend, rising rapidly within 0–96 h and then slowly to the maximum. The AWCD values of T1 and T3 were higher than those of CK and T2. The AWCD, Shannon index, Simpson index, Pielou index, and McIntosh index all showed significant differences among treatments. Compared with CK, T1 and T2 had efficient carbon source utilization. The number of bacteria and actinomycetes had positive correlations with AWCD value, Shannon index, Simpson index, McIntosh index, and Pielou index (p<0.05 or p<0.01), while that of cultivable fungi was negatively correlated with AWCD value, Shannon index, Simpson index, McIntosh index, and Pielou index (p<0.05 or p<0.01). [Conclusion] Upon the in situ treatment of waste by earthworms, the soil can harbor more microbial communities with higher diversity and higher efficiency of carbon source utilization, which reveals the good performance of earthworms in the treatment of waste and the corresponding changes of ecological functions under the new cultivation mode. The findings of this study are expected to provide a theoretical basis for new cultivation modes.

    参考文献
    [1] 毕江涛, 贺达汉, 黄泽勇, 杨磊, 马巧荣. 退化生态系统植被恢复过程中土壤微生物群落活性响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2008, 22(4): 195-200 Bi JT, He DH, Huang ZY, Yang L, Ma QR. Response of soil microbial community activity to vegetation restoration in degraded ecological system[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 22(4): 195-200 (in Chinese)
    [2] 高雪峰, 韩国栋, 张国刚. 短花针茅荒漠草原土壤微生物群落组成及结构[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(15): 5129-5136 Gao XF, Han GD, Zhang GG. Soil microbial community structure and composition of Stipa Breviflora on the desert steppe[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(15): 5129-5136 (in Chinese)
    [3] 陈文新. 土壤和环境微生物学[M]. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1990 Chen WX. Soil and Environmental Microbiology[M]. Beijing: Beijing Agricultural University Press, 1990 (in Chinese)
    [4] 杨海君, 肖启明, 刘安元. 土壤微生物多样性及其作用研究进展[J]. 南华大学学报(自然科学版), 2005,19(4): 21-26, 31 Yang HJ, Xiao QM, Liu AY. Soil microbial diversity and its action[J]. Journal of Nanhua University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 19(4): 21-26, 31 (in Chinese)
    [5] 陈声明, 林海萍, 张立钦. 微生物生态学导论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007: 155-161 Chen SM, Lin HP, Zhang LQ. Introduction to Microbial Ecology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007: 155-161 (in Chinese)
    [6] 刘燕, 李世雄, 尹亚丽, 赵文, 王玉琴. 基于Biolog指纹解析黑土滩退化草地土壤微生物群落特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(7): 1394-1403 Liu Y, Li SX, Yin YL, Zhao W, Wang YQ. Analysis on soil microbial community characteristics of black soil beach degraded grassland based on biolog fingerprint[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 28(7): 1394-1403 (in Chinese)
    [7] 田雅楠, 王红旗. Biolog法在环境微生物功能多样性研究中的应用[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2011, 34(3): 50-57 Tian YN, Wang HQ. Application of biolog to study of environmental microbial function diversity[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 34(3): 50-57 (in Chinese)
    [8] 董邵云, 苗晗, 薄凯亮, 张圣平, 顾兴芳. 黄瓜近缘野生资源的研究进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(6): 1446-1460 Dong SY, Miao H, Bao KL, Zhang SP, Gu XF. Research progress on wild relatives of cucumber[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2020, 21(6): 1446-1460 (in Chinese)
    [9] 齐宝晗, 宋士清. 温室黄瓜抗土壤逆境栽培技术研究进展[J]. 现代园艺, 2021, 44(3): 20-22 Qi BH, Song SQ. Progress on soil adversity cultivation of cucumber in greenhouse[J]. Xiandai Horticulture, 2021, 44(3): 20-22 (in Chinese)
    [10] 樊丽琴, 杨建国, 尚红莺, 张永宏. 脱硫石膏施用下宁夏盐化碱土水盐运移特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(3):193-196 Fan LQ, Yang JG, Shang HY, Zhang YH. Characteristics of soil water and salt movement in a saline aikali soil treated with desulfurized gypsum[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(3):193-196 (in Chinese)
    [11] 李博. 施用蚯蚓粪对葡萄生长品质及土壤的影响研 究[D]. 天津: 天津农学院硕士学位论文, 2020 Li B. Effects of earthworm manure on grape growth quality and soil[D]. Tianjin: Master’s Thesis of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2020 (in Chinese)
    [12] Pramanik P, Chung YR. Changes in fungal population of fly ash and vinasse mixture during vermicomposting by Eudrilus eugeniae and Eisenia fetida: documentation of cellulase isozymes in vermicompost[J]. Waste Management, 2011, 31(6): 1169-1175
    [13] Yadav A, Garg VK. Industrial wastes and sludges management by vermicomposting[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio-Technology, 2011, 10(3): 243-276
    [14] Gupta R, Garg VK. Stabilization of primary sewage sludge during vermicomposting[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 153(3): 1023-1030
    [15] 陈巧燕, 杨健, 王志强, 张国贞. 蚯蚓堆肥处理有机废弃物的国外研究进展[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2006, 24(12): 8-10 Chen QY, Yang J, Wang ZQ, Zhang GZ. Worldwide progress on vermicomposting of organic waste[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 2006, 24(12): 8-10 (in Chinese)
    [16] 鲍世铨, 曾耀辉. 蚯蚓在医药保健方面的综合利用研究[J]. 中国生化药物杂志, 1994, 14(3): 165-168 Bao SQ, Zeng YH. Studies on comprehensive utilization of earthworm in pharmaceutical and health field[J]. Chinese Journal of Biochemical Pharmaceutics, 1994, 14(3): 165-168 (in Chinese)
    [17] 高晓奇, 肖能文, 叶瑶, 付梦娣, 李俊生. 基于Biolog-ECO分析长庆油田土壤微生物群落功能多样性特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2014, 20(5): 913-918 Gao XQ, Xiao NW, Ye Y, Fu MD, Li JS. Analysis of microbial community functional diversity in the Changqing oilfield based on Biolog-ECO method[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2014, 20(5): 913-918 (in Chinese)
    [18] Garland JL, Mills AL. Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1991, 57(8): 2351-2359
    [19] 金凌波, 周峰, 姚涓, 姜大刚, 梅曼彤, 穆虹. 磷高效转基因大豆对根际微生物群落的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(7): 2082-2090 Jin LB, Zhou F, Yao J, Jiang DG, Mei MT, Mu H. Effects of P-efficient transgenic soybean on rhizosphere microbial community[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(7): 2082-2090 (in Chinese)
    [20] 李志斐, 王广军, 谢骏, 郁二蒙, 余德光, 夏耘, 魏南. 草鱼养殖池塘生物膜固着微生物群落碳代谢Biolog分析[J]. 水产学报, 2014, 38(12): 1985-1995 Li ZF, Wang GJ, Xie J, Yu EM, Yu DG, Xia Y, Wei N. Microbial carbon metabolic characteristics of biofilm communities in the grass carp culture pond based on Biolog-ECO plates[J]. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2014, 38(12): 1985-1995 (in Chinese)
    [21] 周庆伍, 李红歌, 李安军, 刘国英, 汤有宏, 何宏魁, 李晓欢. Biolog-ECO解析不同产地大曲微生物群落功能多样性特征[J]. 食品与发酵科技, 2014, 50(3): 53-56 Zhou QW, Li HG, Li AJ, Liu GY, Tang YH, He HK, Li XH. Analysis of microbial community functional diversity in daqu from different regions using Biolog-ECO method[J]. Food and Fermentation Technology, 2014, 50(3): 53-56 (in Chinese)
    [22] 杨明娴, 杜玉芬. 用酵母菌进行“微生物的实验室培养”实验[J]. 生物学通报, 2018, 53(1): 50-52 Yang MX, Du YF. Yeast cells substitute E. coli for laboratory cultivation of microorganisms[J]. Bulletin of Biology, 2018, 53(1): 50-52 (in Chinese)
    [23] 邓茹, 陈曦, 裘丽萍, 孟顺龙, 陈家长. 基于高通量测序及Biolog-ECO方法的雄安新区鲥鯸淀细菌群落结构与功能多样性分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2021, 36(5): 752-759 Deng R, Chen X, Qiu LP, Meng SL, Chen JZ. High-throughput sequencing and Biolog-ECO method were used to analyze the bacterial community structure and functional diversity in the Shihou lake of Xiong’an Area[J]. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 2021, 36(5): 752-759 (in Chinese)
    [24] 周可, 谢凤行, 张峰峰, 孙海波, 赵玉洁, 赵琼. 养 殖池塘底泥预处理方法对Biolog-eco板分析结果的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2019, 25(8): 11-15, 22 Zhou K, Xie FX, Zhang FF, Sun HB, Zhao YJ, Zhao Q. Effects of preprocessing methods of sediment on analysis results of Biolog-Eco Plates[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 25(8): 11-15, 22 (in Chinese)
    [25] 王强, 戴九兰, 吴大千, 余悦, 申天琳, 王仁卿. 微生物生态研究中基于Biolog方法的数据分析[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(3): 817-823 Wang Q, Dai JL, Wu DQ, Yu Y, Shen TL, Wang RQ. Statistical analysis of data from Biolog method in the study of microbial ecology[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(3): 817-823 (in Chinese)
    [26] 陈禹竹, 唐琦勇, 顾美英, 朱静, 刘晓静, 崔卫东, 张志东. 盐爪爪根部微生物分布特征及盐浓度对碳源代谢分析的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2019, 46(11): 2900-2908 Chen YZ, Tang QY, Gu MY, Zhu J, Liu XJ, Cui WD, Zhang ZD. Microbial distribution characteristics around the roots of Kalidium foliatum and the effect of salt concentrations on microbial metabolism analysis[J]. Microbiology China, 2019, 46(11): 2900-2908 (in Chinese)
    [27] 李凤霞, 王学琴, 郭永忠, 许兴. 宁夏引黄灌区不同盐化程度土壤酶活性及微生物多样性研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2013, 20(1): 61-65 Li FX, Wang XQ, Guo YZ, Xu X. Study of microbial diversity and the soil enzyme activity in different salinized soil in Ningxia Yellow River irrigation region[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 20(1): 61-65 (in Chinese)
    [28] 郭莹, 王一明, 巫攀, 彭双. 长期施用粪肥对水稻土中微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(3): 593-602 Guo Y, Wang YM, Wu P, Peng S. Influence of long-term manure application in paddy soil on the functional diversity of microbial community[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2019, 25(3): 593-602 (in Chinese)
    [29] 席劲瑛, 胡洪营, 钱易. Biolog方法在环境微生物群落研究中的应用[J]. 微生物学报, 2003, 43(1): 138-141 Xi JY, Hu HY, Qian Y. Application of Biolog system in the study of microbial community[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2003, 43(1): 138-141 (in Chinese)
    [30] 张志剑, 刘萌, 朱军. 蚯蚓堆肥及蝇蛆生物转化技术在有机废弃物处理应用中的研究进展[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(5): 1679-1686 Zhang ZJ, Liu M, Zhu J. Organic waste treatment by earthworm vermicomposting and larvae bioconversion: review and perspective[J]. Environmental Science, 2013, 34(5): 1679-1686 (in Chinese)
    [31] Bracken CL, Hendricks CW, Harding AK. Apparent bias in river water inoculum following centrifugation[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2006, 67(2): 304-309
    [32] 杨君. 脱硫石膏改良盐碱土及其对3种宿根花卉生长生理特性的影响研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学硕士学位论文, 2020 Yang J. Study on effects of improved saline-alkali soil by flue gas desulfurization gypsum on plant growth and physiological characteristics of three perennial flowers[D]. Beijing: Master’s Thesis of Beijing Forestry University, 2020 (in Chinese)
    [33] 王秀丽, 徐建民, 姚槐应, 谢正苗. 重金属铜、锌、镉、铅复合污染对土壤环境微生物群落的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2003, 23(1): 22-27 Wang XL, Xu JM, Yao HY, Xie ZM. Effects of Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb compound contamination on soil microbial community[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2003, 23(1): 22-27 (in Chinese)
    [34] Braun B, Böckelmann U, Grohmann E, Szewzyk U. Polyphasic characterization of the bacterial community in an urban soil profile with in situ and culture-dependent methods[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2006, 31(3): 267-279
    [35] 郭肖. 土壤改良剂对不同基因型苦荞连作下根际特性的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学硕士学位论文, 2016 Guo X. Effects of soil amendments on rhizosphere properties of different genotype Tartary buckwheat under continuous cropping[D]. Guiyang: Master’s Thesis of Guizhou Normal University, 2016 (in Chinese)
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

申佳丽,安明远,魏彦凤,张文文,游宏建,杨海波,马兰,曹云娥. 三种不同土壤改良剂对黄瓜根际微生物数量和群落代谢功能多样性的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2022, 49(5): 1651-1663

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:336
  • 下载次数: 775
  • HTML阅读次数: 1267
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-22
  • 录用日期:2021-08-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-05-05
文章二维码