科微学术

微生物学通报

牛种布鲁氏菌2308不同途径小鼠感染模型的建立与评估
作者:
基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0500903)


Establishment and evaluation of mice model infected Brucella abortus strain 2308 by different routes
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [27]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [背景] 布鲁氏菌可经口、皮肤、黏膜和呼吸道感染人和动物。小鼠是布鲁氏菌研究中最常用的模型动物。[目的] 建立牛种布鲁氏菌2308不同途径和剂量感染BALB/c小鼠的模型,为布鲁氏菌小鼠感染试验提供参考。[方法] 用101-105 CFU这5个不同感染剂量,分别经注射、口服和点眼方式感染BALB/c小鼠。在感染后不同时间点采集小鼠血清,检测IgG、IgM、IgA抗体含量、脾脏重量及脾脏含菌量,评价布鲁氏菌经不同途径感染BALB/c小鼠的效果。[结果] 10 CFU是注射感染BALB/c小鼠的最小感染剂量;105 CFU是口服感染BALB/c小鼠的最小感染剂量。101-105 CFU这5个不同感染剂量经点眼途径均未能成功感染BALB/c小鼠。在105 CFU感染剂量下,口服与注射感染组小鼠每克脾脏平均含菌量分别为105.673 CFU/g和105.009 CFU/g,无显著差异(P>0.05),但口服感染组小鼠脾脏平均重量为0.310 g,显著高于注射感染组0.165 g (P<0.01)。在试验期内,注射感染组和口服感染组小鼠体内IgG抗体的滴度均随感染时间延长而持续升高;整体上,口服感染组IgG抗体峰值显著高于注射感染组;2组IgM抗体变化趋势一致;口服感染组有2只小鼠在感染28 d后产生IgA抗体,注射感染组均未检测到IgA抗体。[结论] 建立了牛种布鲁氏菌2308通过不同途径感染BALB/c小鼠的模型。

    Abstract:

    [Background] Brucella can infect humans and animals by mouth, skin, mucous and respiratory tract. Mice are the most commonly used model animals in the study of Brucella. [Objective] The study aimed to establish the BALB/c mice model infected by Brucella abortus strain 2308 with different routes and doses, and to provide reference for mice infection experiments by Brucella. [Methods] The BALB/c mice were infected with 5 different doses of 101-105 CFU by injection, mouth and eye droppings respectively. The serum samples were collected at different time points after infection in order to detect IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies. Combined with the results of spleen weight and bacteria content, we evaluated the effect of BALB/c mice model infected with Brucella by different routes. [Results] The results showed that 10 CFU was the minimum infection dose for injection, and 105 CFU was the minimum infection dose for oral administration. The BALB/c mice could not be successfully infected with 5 different doses of 101-105 CFU by eye droppings. At 105 CFU infection dose, the average bacteria content per gram spleen of mice in oral and injection groups was 105.673 CFU/g and 105.009 CFU/g respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (P>0.05). However, the average weight of spleen was 0.310 g in the oral group, which was significantly higher than 0.165 g in the injection group (P<0.01). During the experimental period, the titers of IgG antibody increased continuously with the increase of infection time in injection and oral groups. Overall, the IgG peak value of oral group was significantly higher than that of injection group. The IgM change trend was coincide between the two groups. Two mice in oral group produced IgA antibody 28 days after infection, but IgA antibody was not detectable in injection group. [Conclusion] This study established the BALB/c mice model infected Brucella abortus strain 2308 by different routes.

    参考文献
    [1] Johansen MV, Welburn SC, Dorny P, Brattig NW. Control of neglected zoonotic diseases[J]. Acta Tropica, 2017, 165:1-2
    [2] Olsen SC, Palmer MV. Advancement of knowledge of Brucella over the past 50 years[J]. Veterinary Pathology, 2014, 51(6):1076-1089
    [3] Byndloss MX, Tsolis RM. Brucella spp. virulence factors and immunity[J]. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 2016, 4(1):111-127
    [4] von Bargen K, Gorvel JP, Salcedo SP. Internal affairs:investigating the Brucella intracellular lifestyle[J]. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2012, 36(3):533-562
    [5] Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV. The new global map of human brucellosis[J]. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2006, 6(2):91-99
    [6] Zhu LQ, Wang F, Jiang H, Feng Y, Zhang JY, Zhang G, Zhang Z, Pi XC, Wang N, Mao KR, et al. A comparative study on the complement fixation test for diagnosis of animal brucellosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science, 2016, 36(2):357-361,368(in Chinese)朱良全, 王芳, 蒋卉, 冯宇, 张金亚, 张阁, 张振, 皮向成, 王楠, 毛开荣, 等. 动物布鲁菌病补体结合试验诊断方法比较研究[J]. 中国兽医学报, 2016, 36(2):357-361,368
    [7] Robi DT, Gelalcha BD. Epidemiological investigation of brucellosis in breeding female cattle under the traditional production system of Jimma zone in Ethiopia[J]. Veterinary and Animal Science, 2020, 9:100117
    [8] Ding JB, Dong H. Animal Brucellosis[M]. Beijing:China Agricultural Press, 2020(in Chinese)丁家波, 董浩. 动物布鲁氏菌病[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2020
    [9] Smither SJ, Perkins SD, Davies C, Stagg AJ, Nelson M, Atkins HS. Development and characterization of mouse models of infection with aerosolized Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis[J]. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology:CVI, 2009, 16(5):779-783
    [10] Silva TMA, Costa EA, Paixão TA, Tsolis RM, Santos RL. Laboratory animal models for brucellosis research[J]. Journal of Biomedicine & Biotechnology, 2011, 2011:518323
    [11] Zhu LQ, Feng Y, Zhang G, Jiang H, Zhang Z, Wang N, Ding JB, Suo X. Brucella suis strain 2 vaccine is safe and protective against heterologous Brucella spp. infections[J]. Vaccine, 2016, 34(3):395-400
    [12] Kim S, Lee DS, Watanabe K, Furuoka H, Suzuki H, Watarai M. Interferon-γ promotes abortion due to Brucella infection in pregnant mice[J]. BMC Microbiology, 2005, 5(1):22
    [13] Narnaware SD, Dahiya SS, Kumar S, Tuteja FC, Nath K, Patil NV. Pathological and diagnostic investigations of abortions and neonatal mortality associated with natural infection of Brucella abortus in dromedary camels[J]. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 2017, 26(1):79-85
    [14] Fu YY. Effect of infection in limited feeding of BALB/c mice challenged by aerosolized Brucella[D]. Changchun:Master's Thesis of Jilin Agricultural University, 2014(in Chinese)付莹莹. 限饲条件下布鲁氏菌气溶胶感染小鼠的感染效果[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学硕士学位论文, 2014
    [15] Liu YF, Dong H, Peng XW, Gao Q, Jiang H, Xu GL, Qin YM, Niu JR, Sun SJ, Li P, et al. RNA-seq reveals the critical role of Lon protease in stress response and Brucella virulence[J]. Microbial Pathogenesis, 2019, 130:112-119
    [16] Jiang H, Dong H, Peng XW, Feng Y, Zhu LQ, Niu K, Peng Y, Fan HJ, Ding JB. Transcriptome analysis of gene expression profiling of infected macrophages between Brucella suis 1330 and live attenuated vaccine strain S2 displays mechanistic implication for regulation of virulence[J]. Microbial Pathogenesis, 2018, 119:241-247
    [17] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. National Standard (Recommended) of the People's Republic of China:Diagnostic techniques for animal brucellosis. GB/T 18646-2018[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2018(in Chinese)中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 中华人民共和国推荐性国家标准:动物布鲁氏菌病诊断技术GB/T 18646-2018[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2018
    [18] Bricker BJ, Halling SM. Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1994, 32(11):2660-2666
    [19] Negrón ME, Kharod GA, Bower WA, Walke H. Notes from the field:human Brucella abortus RB51 infections caused by consumption of unpasteurized domestic dairy products-United States, 2017-2019[J]. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2019, 68(7):185
    [20] Guimarães ES, Gomes MTR, Campos PC, Mansur DS, Dos Santos AA, Harms J, Splitter G, Smith JA, Barber GN, Oliveira SC. Brucella abortus cyclic dinucleotides trigger STING-dependent unfolded protein response that favors bacterial replication[J]. Journal of Immunology, 2019, 202(9):2671-2681
    [21] Araiza-Villanueva M, Avila-Calderón ED, Flores-Romo L, Calderón-Amador J, Sriranganathan N, Qublan HA, Witonsky S, Aguilera-Arreola MG, Ruiz-Palma MDS, Ruiz EA, et al. Proteomic analysis of membrane blebs of Brucella abortus 2308 and RB51 and their evaluation as an acellular vaccine[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019, 10:2714
    [22] Wang HB, Hoffman C, Yang XH, Clapp B, Pascual DW. Targeting resident memory T cell immunity culminates in pulmonary and systemic protection against Brucella infection[J]. PLoS Pathogens, 2020, 16(1):e1008176
    [23] Reyes AWB, Vu SH, Huy TXN, Min W, Lee HJ, Chang HH, Lee JH, Kim S. Modulatory effect of linoleic acid during Brucella abortus 544 infection in murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells and murine model BALB/c mice[J]. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2020, 30(5):642-648
    [24] Gutiérrez-Jiménez C, Hysenaj L, Alfaro-Alarcón A, Mora-Cartín R, Arce-Gorvel V, Moreno E, Gorvel JP, Barquero-Calvo E. Persistence of Brucella abortus in the bone marrow of infected mice[J]. Journal of Immunology Research, 2018, 2018:5370414
    [25] Godfroid J, Cloeckaert A, Liautard JP, Kohler S, Fretin D, Walravens K, Garin-Bastuji B, Letesson JJ. From the discovery of the Malta fever's agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brucellosis has continuously been a re-emerging zoonosis[J]. Veterinary Research, 2005, 36(3):313-326
    [26] Ferrero MC, Hielpos MS, Carvalho NB, Barrionuevo P, Corsetti PP, Giambartolomei GH, Oliveira SC, Baldi PC. Key role of Toll-like receptor 2 in the inflammatory response and major histocompatibility complex class ii downregulation in Brucella abortus-infected alveolar macrophages[J]. Infection and Immunity, 2014, 82(2):626-639
    [27] Feng Y. Research of diagnostic method for bovine brucellosis[D]. Taian:Doctoral Dissertation of Shandong Agricultural University, 2017(in Chinese)冯宇. 牛布鲁氏菌病诊断技术研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学博士学位论文, 2017
    引证文献
引用本文

蒋卉,冯宇,沈青春,彭小薇,朱良全,丁家波. 牛种布鲁氏菌2308不同途径小鼠感染模型的建立与评估[J]. 微生物学通报, 2021, 48(11): 4190-4197

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-24
  • 录用日期:2021-04-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-11-11
文章二维码